theory: be important in public health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explanation
Weight: 0.71
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings string theory
Weight: 0.75
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.75
, relativity
Weight: 0.72
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, constructivism
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in public health 1.00
be important in health 0.94
be important in education 0.82
be important in social work 0.78
be important in educational management 0.78
be relevant in social science 0.76
be important counselling 0.75
be important to geoligists 0.75
be important to science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(theory, be important in public health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in public health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(theory, be important in public health)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, be important in education)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in education)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(theory, be important in social work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in education)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(theory, be important in educational management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important in educational management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(theory, be relevant in social science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(theory, be relevant in social science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(theory, be important counselling)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(theory, be important to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in educational management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(theory, be relevant in social science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important counselling)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in education)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in educational management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important counselling)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(theory, be relevant in social science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(theory, be important in public health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)