theory: be more reliable than hypotheses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explanation
Weight: 0.71
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings string theory
Weight: 0.75
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.75
, relativity
Weight: 0.72
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, constructivism
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more reliable than hypotheses 1.00
is hypotheses 0.91
have greater certainty than hypotheses 0.89
be more important than theories 0.86
be stronger than hypothesis 0.86
be different from hypothesis 0.85
is hypothesis 0.84
be more important than modern theories 0.84
differ from hypothesis 0.81
be more important than facts 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(string theory, is hypothesis)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(string theory, is hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(string theory, is hypothesis)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(theory, is hypotheses)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(theory, differ from hypothesis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(theory, is hypotheses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(theory, is hypotheses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(theory, is hypothesis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than theories)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(theory, is hypotheses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(theory, is hypothesis)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(theory, differ from hypothesis)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(theory, differ from hypothesis)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than facts)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(theory, differ from hypothesis)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(theory, is hypothesis)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than facts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(theory, is hypothesis)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(theory, be more important than theories)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than facts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(theory, be more important than facts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(string theory, is hypothesis)