theory: be stronger than hypothesis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explanation
Weight: 0.71
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings string theory
Weight: 0.75
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.75
, relativity
Weight: 0.72
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, constructivism
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stronger than hypothesis 1.00
be different from hypothesis 0.92
is hypothesis 0.91
differ from hypothesis 0.88
be vs hypothesis 0.86
be more reliable than hypotheses 0.86
be more important than theories 0.84
have greater certainty than hypotheses 0.84
is hypotheses 0.81
be more important than modern theories 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(string theory, is hypothesis)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(string theory, is hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(string theory, is hypothesis)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(theory, is hypothesis)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(theory, differ from hypothesis)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(theory, is hypothesis)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(theory, differ from hypothesis)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(theory, differ from hypothesis)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(theory, is hypothesis)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(theory, is hypotheses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be different from hypothesis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(theory, be vs hypothesis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(theory, be vs hypothesis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(theory, is hypothesis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(theory, is hypotheses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(theory, is hypotheses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(theory, differ from hypothesis)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(theory, be vs hypothesis)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(theory, be more important than theories)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be vs hypothesis)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(theory, be more reliable than hypotheses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than theories)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(theory, have greater certainty than hypotheses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(theory, is hypotheses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(theory, be stronger than hypothesis)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(string theory, is hypothesis)