third party: be much more viable in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.80
, party
Weight: 0.79
, candidate
Weight: 0.69
Siblings green party
Weight: 0.79
, democratic party
Weight: 0.75
, congress
Weight: 0.65
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.64
, time
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much more viable in uk 1.00
survive in uk england 0.80
is more expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(third party, be much more viable in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(third party, survive in uk england)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(third party, survive in uk england)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(third party, survive in uk england)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(third party, survive in uk england)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(third party, is more expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(third party, is more expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(third party, is more expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(third party, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(third party, be much more viable in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(third party, be much more viable in uk)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(third party, be much more viable in uk)