third person: be better second point of view

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.67
, force
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arbitrator
Weight: 0.51
, one person
Weight: 0.40
, elderly person
Weight: 0.38
, homeless person
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better second point of view 1.00
be different from points of view 0.87
be different from other points of view 0.86
be better than first 0.83
is view 0.82
be omniscient different from first person point of view 0.82
be omniscient different from person point of view 0.78
be different from points 0.78
be different from other points 0.77
be omniscient point of view 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(person, be omniscient different from first person point of view)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(person, be different from other points of view)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(third person, be better second point of view)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(person, be better second point of view)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(person, be different from other points of view)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(person, be omniscient different from first person point of view)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(person, be better second point of view)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(person, be omniscient different from first person point of view)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(person, be different from other points of view)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(person, be different from other points of view)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(person, be omniscient different from first person point of view)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(third person, be better second point of view)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(third person, be different from points of view)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(third person, be different from points of view)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(third person, be different from points of view)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(third person, be different from other points of view)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(third person, is view)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(third person, be different from other points of view)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(third person, is view)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(third person, is view)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(third person, be different from points of view)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(third person, be omniscient different from first person point of view)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(third person, be different from other points of view)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(third person, be different from points)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(third person, be different from other points of view)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(third person, be omniscient different from person point of view)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(third person, be different from points)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(third person, be omniscient different from person point of view)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(third person, be omniscient point of view)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(third person, be omniscient different from first person point of view)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(third person, be different from other points)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(third person, be better than first)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(third person, be different from points)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(third person, be omniscient different from person point of view)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third person, be different from points)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(third person, be omniscient point of view)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(third person, be omniscient different from person point of view)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(third person, be omniscient point of view)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(third person, be omniscient different from first person point of view)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(third person, be different from other points)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(third person, be different from other points)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(third person, be better than first)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(third person, be different from other points)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(third person, be better than first)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(third person, be omniscient different from first person point of view)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better than first)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(third person, is view)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(third person, be omniscient point of view)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(third person, be better second point of view)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(person, be different from other points of view)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(person, be omniscient different from first person point of view)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(person, be better second point of view)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(person, be different from other points of view)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(person, be better second point of view)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(third person, be better second point of view)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(person, be omniscient different from first person point of view)