third person: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.67
, force
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arbitrator
Weight: 0.51
, one person
Weight: 0.40
, elderly person
Weight: 0.38
, homeless person
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(third person, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(third person, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(third person, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(third person, has quality definition)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(third person, has quality definition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(third person, has quality definition)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(third person, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(third person, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(third person, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(third person, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)