thomas: be under investigation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents saint
Weight: 0.61
, writer
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.60
, artist
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thomas hobbes
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under investigation 1.00
is is investigated 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thomas, be under investigation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(thomas, be under investigation)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(thomas, be under investigation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(thomas, is is investigated)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(thomas, be under investigation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(thomas, is is investigated)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(thomas, be under investigation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(thomas, is is investigated)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thomas, be under investigation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(thomas, is is investigated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(thomas, be under investigation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(thomas, be under investigation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(thomas, be under investigation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thomas, be under investigation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(thomas, be under investigation)