thumbnail: be such poor quality in card view

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents image
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.54
, icon
Weight: 0.49
, size
Weight: 0.48
Siblings picture frame
Weight: 0.33
, photo
Weight: 0.32
, window pane
Weight: 0.32
, screen saver
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be such poor quality in card view 1.00
is quality 0.77
show up randomly in card mode 0.76
quality 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thumbnail, show up randomly in card mode)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(thumbnail, quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(thumbnail, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(thumbnail, show up randomly in card mode)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(thumbnail, quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(thumbnail, is quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(thumbnail, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(thumbnail, show up randomly in card mode)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(thumbnail, quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(thumbnail, quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(thumbnail, is quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(thumbnail, show up randomly in card mode)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(thumbnail, be such poor quality in card view)