thunder: be considered danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.69
, noise
Weight: 0.59
, effect
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, team
Weight: 0.56
Siblings air horn
Weight: 0.34
, siren
Weight: 0.34
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.34
, scream
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered danger 1.00
is dangerous 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thunderstorm, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(siren, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(siren, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(siren, is dangerous)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thunderstorm, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(thunderstorm, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(thunder, be considered danger)

Similarity expansion

0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thunder, is dangerous)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thunder, is dangerous)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(thunder, is dangerous)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(thunder, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(thunder, be considered danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(thunder, be considered danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(siren, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(thunder, be considered danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(thunderstorm, is dangerous)