thunder: be loud in florida

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.69
, noise
Weight: 0.59
, effect
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, team
Weight: 0.56
Siblings air horn
Weight: 0.34
, siren
Weight: 0.34
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.34
, scream
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be loud in florida 1.00
be louder in florida 0.91
be louder in texas 0.81
is loud 0.78
play in mexico city 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(air horn, is loud)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(air horn, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(air horn, is loud)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(thunder, be loud in florida)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(thunder, be louder in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(thunder, be louder in florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(thunder, be louder in florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(thunder, be louder in florida)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(thunder, is loud)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(thunder, is loud)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(thunder, is loud)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(thunder, is loud)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(thunder, be loud in florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(thunder, be loud in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(thunder, be loud in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(air horn, is loud)