thunderbird: be good for children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.55
, application
Weight: 0.54
, email
Weight: 0.53
, brand
Weight: 0.53
, school
Weight: 0.53
Siblings subaru
Weight: 0.32
, apache
Weight: 0.32
, nissan
Weight: 0.31
, saturn
Weight: 0.31
, volvo
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for children 1.00
be good for kids 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(school, be good for kids)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thunderbird, be good for children)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(school, be good for kids)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(school, be good for kids)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(school, be good for kids)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(thunderbird, be good for children)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(thunderbird, be good for children)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thunderbird, be good for kids)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(thunderbird, be good for kids)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(thunderbird, be good for kids)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(thunderbird, be good for kids)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(thunderbird, be good for children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thunderbird, be good for children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(school, be good for kids)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(thunderbird, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(school, be good for kids)