tick: be dangerous to dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vector
Weight: 0.63
, parasite
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, mark
Weight: 0.55
Siblings mosquito bite
Weight: 0.33
, ladybug
Weight: 0.32
, mosquito
Weight: 0.32
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous to dogs 1.00
be harmful to dogs 0.91
be bad for dogs 0.91
be good for dogs 0.90
get on dogs 0.89
go on dogs 0.89
kill dogs 0.87
live on dogs 0.87
die on dogs 0.85
appear on dogs 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(tick, be dangerous to dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tick, go on dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tick, go on dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tick, get on dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tick, go on dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tick, die on dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(tick, die on dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tick, get on dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tick, die on dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tick, be bad for dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(tick, get on dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tick, die on dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tick, live on dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tick, be good for dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tick, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(tick, live on dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tick, live on dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tick, be bad for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tick, be bad for dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tick, live on dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(tick, be good for dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tick, go on dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tick, be good for dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tick, get on dogs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tick, be good for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tick, be dangerous to dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tick, be dangerous to dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tick, be dangerous to dogs)