tie: be figured into standings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.55
, part
Weight: 0.54
, time
Weight: 0.54
, accessory
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bolo
Weight: 0.40
, play game
Weight: 0.33
, playing game
Weight: 0.33
, win
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be figured into standings 1.00
be figured into standings for baseball 0.97
be factored into standings 0.92
be broken in conference standings 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tie, be figured into standings)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tie, be broken in conference standings)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tie, be figured into standings for baseball)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(tie, be figured into standings for baseball)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tie, be broken in conference standings)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tie, be factored into standings)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tie, be broken in conference standings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tie, be factored into standings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tie, be factored into standings)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tie, be factored into standings)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tie, be broken in conference standings)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tie, be figured into standings for baseball)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tie, be figured into standings for baseball)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tie, be figured into standings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tie, be figured into standings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tie, be figured into standings)