tie: be in totals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.55
, part
Weight: 0.54
, time
Weight: 0.54
, accessory
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bolo
Weight: 0.40
, play game
Weight: 0.33
, playing game
Weight: 0.33
, win
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in totals 1.00
be in totals broken 0.94
count as losses in terms of % 0.76
count as losses in terms of win % 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(tie, be in totals)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tie, be in totals broken)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(tie, be in totals broken)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tie, be in totals broken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(tie, be in totals broken)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tie, count as losses in terms of win %)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tie, count as losses in terms of %)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tie, count as losses in terms of win %)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tie, count as losses in terms of %)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tie, count as losses in terms of %)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tie, count as losses in terms of win %)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tie, count as losses in terms of %)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tie, count as losses in terms of win %)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tie, be in totals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tie, be in totals)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tie, be in totals)