tiger shark: communicate amongst themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, shark
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, predator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, bull shark
Weight: 0.42
, great white shark
Weight: 0.41
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
communicate amongst themselves 1.00
protect themselves 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bull shark, protect themselves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, protect themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(great white shark, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(great white shark, protect themselves)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(bull shark, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bull shark, protect themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger shark, protect themselves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, protect themselves)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tiger shark, protect themselves)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, protect themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(great white shark, protect themselves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, communicate amongst themselves)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bull shark, protect themselves)