tiger shark: is near threatened

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, shark
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, predator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, bull shark
Weight: 0.42
, great white shark
Weight: 0.41
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is near threatened 1.00
is threatened 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bull shark, is threatened)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(bull shark, is threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bull shark, is threatened)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is near threatened)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is threatened)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is threatened)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is threatened)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is threatened)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is near threatened)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is near threatened)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is near threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bull shark, is threatened)