tiger: be endangered animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be endangered animals 1.00
is endangered animals 1.00
be endagerd animals 0.89
be animals 0.89
is indanged animals 0.89
is animals 0.89
be dangerous to animals 0.88
be dangerous to other animals 0.86
is wild animal 0.84
eat animals 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lion, eat animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tiger, be endangered animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lion, eat animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lion, eat animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is endangered animals)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is animals)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(lion, eat animals)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tiger, be endangered animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bengal tiger, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, is endangered animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(bengal tiger, is animals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, is animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(tiger shark, is animals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tiger, be endangered animals)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tiger, is animals)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tiger, is animals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tiger, is animals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tiger, eat animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tiger, eat animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tiger, eat animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tiger, eat animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tiger, be endangered animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lion, eat animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, is animals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, is endangered animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tiger, be endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lion, eat animals)