tiger: has physical part whiskers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part whiskers 1.00
use whiskers 0.93
has physical part teeth 0.84
has physical part tails 0.82
has physical part eyes 0.82
have sharp teeth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cat, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lion, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(predator, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lion, has physical part whiskers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(predator, have sharp teeth)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cat, use whiskers)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lion, has physical part whiskers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cat, use whiskers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(predator, have sharp teeth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cat, use whiskers)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lion, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cat, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(predator, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(elephant, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(elephant, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tiger, has physical part whiskers)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tiger, use whiskers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tiger, use whiskers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tiger, use whiskers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, use whiskers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tiger, have sharp teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tiger, have sharp teeth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part eyes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tiger, has physical part eyes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part eyes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part eyes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tiger, have sharp teeth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tiger, have sharp teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lion, has physical part whiskers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, use whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(predator, have sharp teeth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lion, has physical part whiskers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(predator, have sharp teeth)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, use whiskers)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part tails)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tiger, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part eyes)