tiger: has state wild

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state wild 1.00
survive in wild 0.87
behave in wild 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(lion, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger, has state wild)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lion, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger, has state wild)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lion, behave in wild)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger, has state wild)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(lion, has state wild)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(lion, survive in wild)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lion, behave in wild)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lion, has state wild)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lion, survive in wild)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lion, behave in wild)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rhino, survive in wild)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(lion, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lion, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(lion, behave in wild)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiger, has state wild)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(rhino, survive in wild)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tiger, has state wild)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tiger, survive in wild)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tiger, behave in wild)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tiger, survive in wild)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tiger, survive in wild)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tiger, behave in wild)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(tiger, behave in wild)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tiger, survive in wild)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tiger, behave in wild)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger, has state wild)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lion, behave in wild)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lion, has state wild)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lion, survive in wild)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rhino, survive in wild)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lion, has state wild)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lion, survive in wild)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lion, behave in wild)