tiger: live in forest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in forest 1.00
living in forest 0.95
live in rainforest 0.87
live in savanna 0.82
live in jungle 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(lion, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger, live in forest)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lion, live in savanna)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger, live in forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(lion, live in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lion, live in savanna)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lion, live in forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(lion, live in savanna)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, live in rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rhino, live in rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(lion, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lion, live in savanna)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tiger, live in forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(bengal tiger, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, live in rainforest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rhino, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rhino, live in rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(tiger, live in forest)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tiger, living in forest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tiger, live in rainforest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tiger, living in forest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(tiger, living in forest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tiger, live in savanna)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tiger, live in jungle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tiger, living in forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tiger, live in rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(tiger, live in savanna)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tiger, live in savanna)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tiger, live in rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in rainforest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tiger, live in jungle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in savanna)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tiger, live in jungle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in jungle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger, live in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lion, live in forest)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lion, live in savanna)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, live in rainforest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rhino, live in rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lion, live in forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tiger, live in forest)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lion, live in savanna)