timber: is renewable resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
, raw material
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings balsa
Weight: 0.39
, lumber
Weight: 0.37
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.37
, wood
Weight: 0.36
, steel wool
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is renewable resource 1.00
is sustainable resource 0.87
is important resource 0.85
is natural resource 0.84
be important as resource 0.84
is important natural resource 0.83
has quality resource 0.83
was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century 0.75
was such important resource in century 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(timber, is renewable resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wood, is renewable resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(timber, is renewable resource)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(timber, is sustainable resource)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(timber, is important resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(timber, be important as resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(timber, is sustainable resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(timber, has quality resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(timber, is important resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(timber, has quality resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(timber, be important as resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(timber, is important natural resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(timber, is sustainable resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(timber, is sustainable resource)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(timber, has quality resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(timber, has quality resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(timber, be important as resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(timber, is important resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(timber, is important natural resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(timber, be important as resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(timber, is important natural resource)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(timber, is important resource)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(timber, is renewable resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wood, is renewable resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)