timber: was such important resource in century

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
, raw material
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings balsa
Weight: 0.39
, lumber
Weight: 0.37
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.37
, wood
Weight: 0.36
, steel wool
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century 1.00
was such important resource in century 1.00
be important as resource 0.89
is important resource 0.88
is important natural resource 0.86
is natural resource 0.83
has quality resource 0.83
is sustainable resource 0.80
is renewable resource 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(wood, is renewable resource)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wood, is renewable resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(timber, be important as resource)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(timber, is important resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(timber, is important natural resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in mid-nineteenth century)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(timber, be important as resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(timber, has quality resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(timber, be important as resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(timber, is important resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(timber, is important resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(timber, is important natural resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(timber, is important natural resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(timber, is sustainable resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(timber, has quality resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(timber, has quality resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(timber, is sustainable resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(timber, is renewable resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(timber, be important as resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(timber, is sustainable resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(timber, is important resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(timber, is important natural resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(timber, is renewable resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(timber, is renewable resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(timber, has quality resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(timber, is sustainable resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wood, is renewable resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, was such important resource in century)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)