timbuktu: be considered city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, town
Weight: 0.50
, historical site
Weight: 0.47
, part
Weight: 0.42
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.29
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.29
, new york city
Weight: 0.28
, mexico city
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered city 1.00
is city 0.91
be important as city 0.88
be considered lost city 0.87
was important trade city 0.78
was trade city 0.78
is lost city 0.78
be considered center 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be considered city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(mexico city, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be considered city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new york city, is city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new york city, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mexico city, is city)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(timbuktu, be considered city)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered lost city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, be considered lost city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(timbuktu, be considered lost city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, is city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(timbuktu, is city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(timbuktu, is city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, is lost city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, is lost city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(timbuktu, is lost city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, was trade city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, is city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(timbuktu, be considered lost city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, was important trade city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(timbuktu, was trade city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(timbuktu, was important trade city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, was important trade city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, was trade city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, be considered center)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(timbuktu, be considered center)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(timbuktu, be considered center)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(timbuktu, was trade city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(timbuktu, is lost city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered center)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(timbuktu, was important trade city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be important as city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(timbuktu, be important as city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, be important as city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(timbuktu, be important as city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mexico city, be considered city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new york city, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mexico city, is city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(timbuktu, be considered city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)