timbuktu: is poor again

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, town
Weight: 0.50
, historical site
Weight: 0.47
, part
Weight: 0.42
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.29
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.29
, new york city
Weight: 0.28
, mexico city
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor again 1.00
is poor 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(timbuktu, is poor again)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(timbuktu, is poor again)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(timbuktu, is poor again)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, is poor)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(timbuktu, is poor again)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(timbuktu, is poor)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(timbuktu, is poor again)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, is poor)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(timbuktu, is poor again)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(timbuktu, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(timbuktu, is poor again)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(timbuktu, is poor again)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, is poor again)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(timbuktu, is poor again)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(timbuktu, is poor again)