tin cans: be better than steel cans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents album
Weight: 0.49
Siblings guitar
Weight: 0.29
, reggae
Weight: 0.27
, dookie
Weight: 0.27
, midnight sun
Weight: 0.27
, solo
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than steel cans 1.00
is steel cans 0.96
is steel cans coated 0.91
is steel cans coated with tin 0.90
be vs aluminum cans 0.87
be made of steel 0.83
ever made of tin 0.77
be made out of metal 0.76
be made of tin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tin cans, is steel cans)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(tin cans, is steel cans)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tin cans, is steel cans)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tin cans, is steel cans coated)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(tin cans, is steel cans coated)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tin cans, is steel cans coated with tin)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tin cans, is steel cans coated with tin)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tin cans, is steel cans coated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tin cans, be made of steel)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, is steel cans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tin cans, be made of steel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tin cans, be made of steel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, be made of steel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(tin cans, is steel cans coated with tin)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tin cans, ever made of tin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tin cans, be made out of metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tin cans, ever made of tin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(tin cans, be made out of metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tin cans, be made of tin)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tin cans, be made of tin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tin cans, be made out of metal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, is steel cans coated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(tin cans, ever made of tin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(tin cans, be made of tin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, be vs aluminum cans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, is steel cans coated with tin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, be made out of metal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, be made of tin)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, ever made of tin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, be better than steel cans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tin cans, be better than steel cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tin cans, be better than steel cans)