tin cans: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents album
Weight: 0.49
Siblings guitar
Weight: 0.29
, reggae
Weight: 0.27
, dookie
Weight: 0.27
, midnight sun
Weight: 0.27
, solo
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
vary much in price 0.81
has quality good 0.80
has quality standard 0.80
has quality better 0.79
is value 0.79
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(guitar, vary much in price)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(reggae, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality standard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(guitar, vary much in price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(guitar, vary much in price)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(reggae, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(reggae, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(solo, has quality standard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(solo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(solo, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(guitar, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(guitar, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tin cans, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(tin cans, is value)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tin cans, is value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tin cans, is value)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, is value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tin cans, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(solo, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(guitar, vary much in price)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(solo, has quality standard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(reggae, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tin cans, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(guitar, has quality better)