tire: go in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, equipment
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spare tire
Weight: 0.69
, tread
Weight: 0.46
, spare
Weight: 0.44
, flat tire
Weight: 0.35
, car tire
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
go in winter 1.00
look in winter 0.93
help during winter 0.90
go in cold weather 0.85
go in weather 0.84
go in cold 0.84
get in cold weather 0.82
get in weather 0.81
go in extreme cold 0.79
look in cold 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(car tire, go in cold weather)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(car tire, go in weather)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(car tire, go in weather)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(car tire, go in weather)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(car tire, go in cold weather)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(car tire, go in cold weather)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tire, go in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tire, look in winter)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tire, look in winter)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tire, help during winter)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tire, help during winter)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tire, look in winter)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tire, help during winter)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tire, look in winter)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tire, help during winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tire, go in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tire, go in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(car tire, go in weather)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tire, go in winter)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(car tire, go in cold weather)