tlc: be poor technique for analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents channel
Weight: 0.62
, network
Weight: 0.61
, brand
Weight: 0.56
, tv show
Weight: 0.56
, group
Weight: 0.55
Siblings kate
Weight: 0.34
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, simpsons
Weight: 0.33
, computer network
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be poor technique for analysis 1.00
be poor technique for analysis of liquids 0.93
be poor technique for analysis of low liquids 0.93
be poor technique for analysis of low boiling liquids 0.90
be poor technique for analysis of boiling liquids 0.90
be useful technique in chemistry 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low boiling liquids)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low boiling liquids)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low liquids)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low boiling liquids)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low liquids)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low boiling liquids)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of liquids)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of boiling liquids)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of boiling liquids)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of liquids)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low liquids)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of boiling liquids)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of boiling liquids)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of liquids)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of low liquids)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis of liquids)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tlc, be poor technique for analysis)