tlc: be valuable to organic chemists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents channel
Weight: 0.62
, network
Weight: 0.61
, brand
Weight: 0.56
, tv show
Weight: 0.56
, group
Weight: 0.55
Siblings kate
Weight: 0.34
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, simpsons
Weight: 0.33
, computer network
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable to organic chemists 1.00
be valuable to chemists 0.95
be used in organic chemistry 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(tlc, be valuable to chemists)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tlc, be valuable to chemists)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(tlc, be used in organic chemistry)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tlc, be used in organic chemistry)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tlc, be valuable to chemists)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tlc, be used in organic chemistry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tlc, be valuable to chemists)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tlc, be used in organic chemistry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tlc, be valuable to organic chemists)