tlc: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents channel
Weight: 0.62
, network
Weight: 0.61
, brand
Weight: 0.56
, tv show
Weight: 0.56
, group
Weight: 0.55
Siblings kate
Weight: 0.34
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, simpsons
Weight: 0.33
, computer network
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
is valuable 0.83
be useful technique in chemistry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tlc, is useful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tlc, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(network, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(brand, is valuable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(brand, is valuable)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(network, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tlc, is useful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tlc, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(computer network, is useful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(computer network, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(tlc, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tlc, is valuable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tlc, is valuable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tlc, is valuable)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tlc, is valuable)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tlc, be useful technique in chemistry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tlc, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tlc, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(network, is useful)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brand, is valuable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(computer network, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(network, is useful)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tlc, is useful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brand, is valuable)