toad: be in hole called in whole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.63
, character
Weight: 0.61
Siblings frog
Weight: 0.39
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, crocodile
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hole called in whole 1.00
be in hole called 0.93
be in hole called in hole 0.92
be in hole 0.90
be in hole soggy 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(toad, be in hole called in whole)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(toad, be in hole called)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(toad, be in hole called in hole)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(toad, be in hole called in hole)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(toad, be in hole called in hole)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toad, be in hole)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(toad, be in hole called in hole)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(toad, be in hole)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(toad, be in hole called)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(toad, be in hole)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(toad, be in hole)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(toad, be in hole soggy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(toad, be in hole called)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(toad, be in hole called)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(toad, be in hole soggy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(toad, be in hole soggy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(toad, be in hole soggy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(toad, be in hole called in whole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(toad, be in hole called in whole)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(toad, be in hole called in whole)