toast: be at your pocket

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.62
, meal
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, food
Weight: 0.51
, recipe
Weight: 0.51
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.34
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.34
, sandwich
Weight: 0.33
, candy bar
Weight: 0.33
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at your pocket 1.00
be at your house 0.77
be at your mouth 0.76
be used to fill up your stomach 0.76
be at your stomach 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(food, be used to fill up your stomach)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(toast, be at your pocket)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(food, be at your mouth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(toast, be at your pocket)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(food, be at your stomach)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(toast, be at your pocket)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be at your house)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(toast, be at your pocket)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be at your house)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(food, be at your stomach)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(food, be at your mouth)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(food, be used to fill up your stomach)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(food, be at your house)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(food, be at your mouth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(food, be at your stomach)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be used to fill up your stomach)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(food, be used to fill up your stomach)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(toast, be at your pocket)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(food, be at your mouth)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(toast, be at your pocket)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(food, be at your stomach)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(toast, be at your pocket)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be at your house)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(toast, be at your pocket)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(toast, be at your pocket)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(toast, be at your pocket)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(food, be used to fill up your stomach)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(food, be at your mouth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(food, be at your stomach)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(food, be at your house)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(food, be used to fill up your stomach)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(food, be at your mouth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(food, be at your stomach)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(toast, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(food, be at your house)