toast: be high in calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, food
Weight: 0.51
, recipe
Weight: 0.51
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.34
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.34
, sandwich
Weight: 0.33
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in calories 1.00
have calories 0.97
have more calories 0.95
be less calories than bread 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be high in calories)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, have calories)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot chocolate, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, have calories)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sandwich, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(sandwich, have calories)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sandwich, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be high in calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(toast, be high in calories)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(toast, have calories)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(toast, have more calories)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(toast, be less calories than bread)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(toast, be less calories than bread)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(toast, be less calories than bread)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(toast, have more calories)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(toast, have more calories)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(toast, have calories)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(toast, have more calories)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(toast, have calories)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(toast, be less calories than bread)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(toast, have calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(toast, be high in calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(toast, be high in calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have calories)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sandwich, have calories)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(toast, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, be high in calories)