toast: taste nicer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, food
Weight: 0.51
, recipe
Weight: 0.51
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.34
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.34
, sandwich
Weight: 0.33
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste nicer 1.00
be sweeter than bread 0.80
is nice 0.79
be much more delicious than bread 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(toast, taste nicer)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(toast, be sweeter than bread)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(toast, be sweeter than bread)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(toast, be sweeter than bread)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(toast, be much more delicious than bread)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(toast, is nice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(toast, be much more delicious than bread)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(toast, be much more delicious than bread)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toast, be sweeter than bread)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toast, is nice)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(toast, is nice)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(toast, be much more delicious than bread)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(toast, is nice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toast, taste nicer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(toast, taste nicer)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(toast, taste nicer)