toaster: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.68
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.64
, household appliance
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.62
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.37
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36
, dishwasher
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
need expensive 0.92
get more expensive 0.90
be in market expensive 0.86
is cheaper 0.85
be much more costly today 0.84
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.84
be on cheaper 0.83
be sold cheaper 0.81
is overpriced now 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(toaster, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(toaster, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(toaster, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(toaster, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(toaster, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(toaster, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(refrigerator, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(microwave oven, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(toaster, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(toaster, need expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(toaster, need expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(toaster, need expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(toaster, need expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(toaster, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(refrigerator, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(microwave oven, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(toaster, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)