tobacco: be expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcohol
Weight: 0.64
, poison
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, drug use
Weight: 0.62
Siblings nicotine
Weight: 0.62
, virginia
Weight: 0.59
, snuff
Weight: 0.49
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.37
, ethyl alcohol
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in canada 1.00
be prohibited in canada 0.82
be banned in australia 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(snuff, be banned in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(snuff, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(snuff, be banned in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tobacco, be expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be prohibited in canada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(tobacco, be prohibited in canada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tobacco, be prohibited in canada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(tobacco, be prohibited in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tobacco, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(snuff, be banned in australia)