tobacco: be worse than smoking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcohol
Weight: 0.64
, poison
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, drug use
Weight: 0.62
Siblings nicotine
Weight: 0.62
, virginia
Weight: 0.59
, snuff
Weight: 0.49
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.37
, ethyl alcohol
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than smoking 1.00
is smoking 0.89
be better than cigarettes 0.83
affect non smokers 0.80
be put in cigarettes 0.75
is smoked 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(nicotine, be put in cigarettes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(nicotine, be put in cigarettes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nicotine, be put in cigarettes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(tobacco, be worse than smoking)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(tobacco, is smoking)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(tobacco, is smoking)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tobacco, is smoking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tobacco, affect non smokers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(tobacco, be put in cigarettes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tobacco, affect non smokers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tobacco, affect non smokers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tobacco, is smoked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tobacco, is smoked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(tobacco, is smoked)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tobacco, be put in cigarettes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(tobacco, be put in cigarettes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, affect non smokers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, is smoked)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, is smoking)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be better than cigarettes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be put in cigarettes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be worse than smoking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tobacco, be worse than smoking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tobacco, be worse than smoking)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nicotine, be put in cigarettes)