tofu: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, ingredient
Weight: 0.56
, cheese
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soy sauce
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35
, chicken
Weight: 0.35
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be bad for females 0.79
be bad for guys 0.78
be good for babies 0.77
be more expensive than dead animal 0.77
be bad for males 0.77
go bad 0.77
be more expensive than animal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tofu, go bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for females)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(tofu, go bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for males)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tofu, be good for babies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tofu, go bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tofu, go bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for females)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for males)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tofu, be good for babies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for females)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for males)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tofu, be more expensive than animal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tofu, be good for babies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for females)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be good for babies)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than dead animal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for males)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be more expensive than animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)