tofu: be bad for guys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, ingredient
Weight: 0.56
, cheese
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soy sauce
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35
, chicken
Weight: 0.35
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for guys 1.00
go bad 0.85
go fast bad 0.80
be bad for dogs 0.78
be bad for females 0.77
is horrible 0.77
be bad for males 0.77
be bad for environment 0.76
be bad for keto 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, be bad for keto)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hamburger, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(soy sauce, be bad for keto)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, be bad for keto)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(tofu, go bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tofu, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tofu, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tofu, go fast bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tofu, go fast bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tofu, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tofu, is horrible)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(tofu, go fast bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tofu, is horrible)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for females)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for males)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for females)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for males)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for keto)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tofu, is horrible)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tofu, be bad for keto)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for females)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for males)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tofu, be bad for keto)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tofu, is horrible)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tofu, go fast bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for females)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for males)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for keto)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hamburger, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(soy sauce, be bad for keto)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tofu, be bad for guys)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)