toilet paper: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents paper
Weight: 0.71
, paper towel
Weight: 0.71
, toilet
Weight: 0.69
, restroom
Weight: 0.68
, bathroom
Weight: 0.68
Siblings toilet seat
Weight: 0.37
, white paper
Weight: 0.37
, laundry room
Weight: 0.36
, toilet bowl
Weight: 0.36
, paper currency
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad for environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(paper towel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(paper, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(paper, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(paper, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(paper towel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paper, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(paper towel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(toilet paper, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(toilet paper, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(toilet paper, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(paper, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(paper, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be bad for environment)