toll: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents levy
Weight: 0.54
, fee
Weight: 0.53
, charge
Weight: 0.53
, source
Weight: 0.53
, toll road
Weight: 0.51
Siblings turnpike
Weight: 0.31
, surcharge
Weight: 0.31
, income tax
Weight: 0.30
, registration
Weight: 0.30
, light source
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
has quality news 0.79
has quality asset 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(toll road, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(toll, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(toll road, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(toll, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(toll, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(toll, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(toll road, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(toll, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(toll road, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(toll road, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(toll road, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(toll road, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(toll road, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toll road, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(light source, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(surcharge, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(turnpike, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surcharge, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(surcharge, has quality worth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(toll road, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(toll, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(toll, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(toll road, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(toll, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(toll, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(toll road, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(toll, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(surcharge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(surcharge, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(turnpike, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(turnpike, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(light source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(light source, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(surcharge, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(surcharge, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(surcharge, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(surcharge, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(toll, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(toll, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(toll road, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(toll road, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(toll road, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(surcharge, has quality worth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality asset)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(surcharge, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(surcharge, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(turnpike, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(light source, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(toll road, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(toll road, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(toll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(toll road, has quality news)