tom: die in blacklist

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.64
, kid
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.59
, artist
Weight: 0.58
Siblings john smith
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
die in blacklist 1.00
be keen on blacklist 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tom, die in blacklist)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tom, die in blacklist)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tom, die in blacklist)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tom, be keen on blacklist)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tom, die in blacklist)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tom, be keen on blacklist)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tom, die in blacklist)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tom, be keen on blacklist)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(tom, die in blacklist)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tom, be keen on blacklist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tom, die in blacklist)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tom, die in blacklist)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tom, die in blacklist)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tom, die in blacklist)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tom, die in blacklist)