:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tom, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(tom, is popular)
Similarity expansion
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(tom, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tom, is famous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tom, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tom, is famous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tom, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tom, is famous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(tom, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tom, is famous)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(tom, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tom, is popular)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings