tone: be important in communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings speech
Weight: 0.64
, white
Weight: 0.60
, tan
Weight: 0.47
, theme
Weight: 0.33
, style
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communication 1.00
affect communication 0.93
be barrier to communication 0.82
be different in communicating 0.80
communicating online 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(speech, be important in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tone, be important in communication)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tone, affect communication)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tone, affect communication)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(tone, affect communication)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tone, be different in communicating)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(tone, be barrier to communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tone, be different in communicating)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tone, be barrier to communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tone, be different in communicating)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tone, be barrier to communication)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tone, affect communication)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(tone, be barrier to communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tone, communicating online)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tone, communicating online)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tone, be different in communicating)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tone, communicating online)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tone, communicating online)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tone, be important in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tone, be important in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be important in communication)