tone: communicating online

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings speech
Weight: 0.64
, white
Weight: 0.60
, tan
Weight: 0.47
, theme
Weight: 0.33
, style
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
communicating online 1.00
be different in communicating 0.93
be important in communication 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(speech, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(speech, be important in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tone, communicating online)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tone, be different in communicating)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tone, be different in communicating)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tone, be different in communicating)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tone, be important in communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tone, be important in communication)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tone, be different in communicating)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tone, be important in communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tone, communicating online)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tone, communicating online)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tone, communicating online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be important in communication)