tongue: be at your cheek

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organ
Weight: 0.62
, word
Weight: 0.62
, mouth
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.60
Siblings english
Weight: 0.59
, persian
Weight: 0.58
, cunt
Weight: 0.34
, salivary gland
Weight: 0.33
, inner ear
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at your cheek 1.00
be at in your mouth 0.76
be at your mouth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(word, be at your mouth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tongue, be at your cheek)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(word, be at your mouth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(word, be at your mouth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(word, be at your mouth)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tongue, be at your cheek)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tongue, be at your cheek)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tongue, be at in your mouth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tongue, be at in your mouth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tongue, be at in your mouth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tongue, be at in your mouth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tongue, be at your cheek)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tongue, be at your cheek)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(word, be at your mouth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tongue, be at your cheek)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(word, be at your mouth)