tongue: taste steak

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organ
Weight: 0.62
, word
Weight: 0.62
, mouth
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.60
Siblings english
Weight: 0.59
, persian
Weight: 0.58
, cunt
Weight: 0.34
, salivary gland
Weight: 0.33
, inner ear
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste steak 1.00
taste flavour 0.86
taste flavor 0.85
taste many different flavor 0.82
taste salt 0.81
taste if something be sour 0.79
eat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mouth, eat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tongue, taste steak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mouth, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mouth, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mouth, eat)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tongue, taste steak)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(tongue, taste steak)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(tongue, taste flavour)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tongue, taste flavor)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tongue, taste many different flavor)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tongue, taste if something be sour)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tongue, taste if something be sour)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tongue, taste salt)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(tongue, taste salt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(tongue, taste salt)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tongue, taste flavour)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tongue, taste flavor)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tongue, taste many different flavor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tongue, taste salt)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(tongue, taste many different flavor)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(tongue, taste flavor)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tongue, taste flavour)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tongue, taste flavour)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tongue, taste flavor)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tongue, taste many different flavor)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tongue, taste if something be sour)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tongue, taste if something be sour)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tongue, taste steak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tongue, taste steak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(mouth, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tongue, taste steak)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(mouth, eat)