tonic: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cocktail
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.53
, soft drink
Weight: 0.53
, beverage
Weight: 0.50
, man
Weight: 0.50
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.32
, gin
Weight: 0.32
, bottled water
Weight: 0.32
, vodka
Weight: 0.31
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tonic, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cocktail, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tonic, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cocktail, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cocktail, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gin, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tonic, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(cocktail, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tonic, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(gin, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(gin, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(tonic, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tonic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cocktail, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(gin, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cocktail, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tonic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)