tool: being is used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
being is used 1.00
be important for being 0.89
is is used 0.85
be used 0.84
is used for 0.84
be important for human being 0.84
have have used 0.83
be used making 0.78
is used more 0.78
be uesd 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tool, being is used)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tool, being is used)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(resource, be uesd)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tool, being is used)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(resource, be uesd)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for human being)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(resource, be uesd)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for human being)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, is used for)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important for human being)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, being is used)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, being is used)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(resource, be uesd)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, being is used)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(spreadsheet, be used)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be used)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(spreadsheet, is used for)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, is used for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tool, being is used)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, is is used)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tool, is is used)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tool, is used for)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, have have used)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, is used for)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tool, is is used)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tool, is used for)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tool, have have used)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tool, is is used)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tool, is used for)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tool, have have used)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tool, have have used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tool, being is used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(resource, be uesd)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be used)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, is used for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(resource, be uesd)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tool, being is used)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)