tool: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is ungiven good 0.87
has quality worth 0.85
has quality system 0.84
has quality plus 0.84
is great 0.81
be good for business 0.80
has quality resource 0.79
have bad reputation 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(metaphor, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality plus)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(metaphor, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(metaphor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(metaphor, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(metaphor, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(metaphor, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(calculator, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality plus)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spreadsheet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be good for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tool, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tool, has quality worth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tool, is great)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tool, is great)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metaphor, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(metaphor, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality plus)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)